A Truly Horrid Early-Morning Thought

     Yes, I have them. This brief article has stimulated one of the worst:

     Supreme Court Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson has said she is preparing herself to rule on the outcome of a disputed presidential election.
     In an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell, Jackson said the court must be prepared for such an outcome.
     “I think there are legal issues that arise out of the political process,” Jackson said during an interview with CBS’s Norah O’Donnell. “And so, the Supreme Court has to be prepared to respond — if — if that should be necessary.”
     O’Donnell then asked Jackson point blank whether she was personally prepared for a Supreme Court ruling.
     “As prepared as anyone can be,” Jackson responded.

     Now, as it happens, the 2020 presidential election was disputed. No court in the land has been willing to confront the massive evidence against the supposed victory of Joe Biden over incumbent president Donald Trump. But what if the Supreme Court were, at long last, to rule that Trump did indeed win that election, on the grounds that the enormous amount of vote fraud, all of it demonstrably in the Democrats’ favor, disqualified the Biden-Harris ticket?

     That would mean that Trump has been President since January 20, 2017.
     That would mean that Trump has already been President for two terms.
     And that would mean that Trump cannot legally be elected President in 2024.

     Give that a moment to sink in. Me, I think I’ll just shudder awhile.

2 comments

    • CT Ginger on August 28, 2024 at 7:44 AM

    Even if trump were to be declared to have won in 2020, it’s the person sworn in as president who is/was president. Trump could pursue a fraud complaint but that seems pointless . Besides the corruptocrats might then claim he is ineligible for a third term.

    Its sweet that justice Brown has declared herself available and prepared to resolve disputes about the upcoming election but the constitution names the House of Representatives as the body to do that.

    1. Don’t neglect judges’ ability to twist the facts of a case, if they must, to reach the desired conclusion. It’s happened innumerable times — including on the United States Supreme Court.

Comments have been disabled.