“We Don’t Need No Laugh Track!”

     We’ve got enough to laugh at right in front of us…and laugh we must, for the sake of our sanity.

***

1. Did you really need to ask, Megyn?

     Well, she did answer her own question:

     Megyn Kelly wants to know what many of us are thinking.
     As anti-Israel protests continue to rage across America’s college campuses, the former Fox News anchor questioned why so many of the protesters look like they need to focus on themselves rather than issues in the Middle East.
     “Why are they so unattractive? Why are the protesters so homely?” she asked.
     “I think attractive smart people are not drawn to this nonsense. They are living their lives, being successful.”

     Cause People are seldom persons whose personal lives are rich and fulfilling. Political involvement is a convenient ego-bolster for those whose lives are empty and valueless. And he whose life is empty and valueless is nearly always aware of it. Politics has been called “show business for ugly people” for a good reason.

     But few who are unattractive, and incapable of doing anything that others would value, possess the characteristics necessary for success in overt politics. First and foremost, they can’t lie convincingly. Nor do they possess more energy and endurance than would suffice for a day or two of a “sit-in.” Give our politicians this much: they do have to hustle to win high office. Their competition sees to that.

     So our homely, valueless, but unenergetic cohort must turn to another anodyne: the Cause. And the Cause must be something that would disturb the great majority. Otherwise, people would yawn and turn the page. Couple that to the prospect of camaraderie with one’s “comrades,” and the lure becomes obvious.

     Sadly, municipalities cannot “zone” against Causes.

***

2. Quis custodiet,et cetera?

     I’ve become convinced that no one employed by a government can be trusted:

     That was a prosecutor, Gentle Reader. An agent of the State who has the power to ruin lives by accusation alone. I know we’re not supposed to take a refusal to testify as evidence of guilt, but given the subject matter, the specific question involved, and Pomerantz’s unwillingness to answer, what else could we be looking at?

     A prosecutor who, when asked whether he ever violated the law in the course of his public duties, invokes the Fifth Amendment right not to testify against oneself should be tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail. While that would be an “extra-judicial” remedy for untrustworthiness, it would also be a lot of fun.

***

3. Xenophobia Or Good Sense?

     Diagnose for yourself:

     President Joe Biden said Wednesday that U.S. ally Japan was struggling economically because of xenophobia, along with other countries with which the United States has more adversarial relations, including China and Russia.
     Speaking at a campaign fundraiser in Washington that marked the start of Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Heritage Month, Biden said the U.S. economy was growing in part “because we welcome immigrants.”
     “Think about it. Why is China stalling so bad economically?” he said. “Why is Japan having trouble? Why is India? Because they’re xenophobic. They don’t want immigrants.”

     Then why was Japan’s economy in the Seventies and Eighties the envy of the world, Joe? They didn’t admit immigrants then, either.

     Japan’s economic malaise has – as do most conspicuous political maladies – a number of contributing causes. Part of it is financial: the pyramiding of mountains of debt upon the value of urban Japanese real estate. Another part is sunk capital: Japan’s capital plant is difficult to modernize or repurpose. And a third is the rapidly aging Japanese population. But admitting immigrants in large numbers to the highly insular Japanese culture would not be a cure. It would be deadly, about like importing huge amounts of fentanyl…wait, don’t we do that here?

     Whoever’s scripting Biden’s speeches should be updating his resume.

***

4. Shouting Into The Wind.

     It’s highly distressing – on this I speak from experience – to express vital truths when no one is listening:

     As far as I know, Chip Roy is “one of the good ones.” What he said above is gospel truth, and vitally important to the American electorate. But it doesn’t matter. Even the GOP colleagues he lambasted in the above don’t think it matters. The proof: They’re not in the chamber.

     You’ll seldom see the camera that records an emission such as Rep. Roy’s pan out to display the rest of the House chamber. Congressvermin don’t listen to one another’s orations. That would take them away from the far more valuable hobnobbing with lobbyists and logrolling with their opposites across the aisle. That takes place in the lobby, not in the House chamber. But when a vote is called, they’ll flood in, vote, and then…go back to the lobby.

     Federal Republican legislators have two priorities:

  1. Get re-elected;
  2. Keep the swag coming in.

     Their sub rosa alliance with the Democrats provides them with both. As for the occasional maverick such as Chip Roy, he serves a useful function: the “conscience” of the caucus, to be trotted out when some portion of the electorate needs to hear some fire. But should he galvanize a following, he’d be purged.

     I sometimes wonder whether, were there no Chip Roys, would the public finally decide that it’s had enough and flush the Congressional toilet? Impossible to say, I know. But I can dream.

***

     That’s all for today, Gentle Reader. I have a host of chores before me, so stay warm, dry, and properly lubricated. Back tomorrow, I hope.

5 comments

Skip to comment form

    • OneGuy on May 3, 2024 at 9:46 AM

    I think it is true that a policeman when investigated for wrongdoing cannot take the fifth and keep his job.  They are required to be responsible for their actions on the job and an unwillingness to be honest about their actions is enough to terminate them.   I don’t know Mr Pomerantz’s status or if he is still employed by government but I would think that if a prosecutor cannot be honest about his actions that at the least everyone of his cases should be investigated and perhaps retried.

    • Mike in Canada on May 3, 2024 at 12:41 PM

    Sir,

    With regard to Item #1 above….

    We have noted another influence on the weak-minded you portray, and that seems to be some flavour of ‘addiction to doing something…anything, as long as it’s something’.

    See, we have a friend who is all about online petitions. Until we asked him to stop, he was forever sending us links to this petition or that, mostly having to do with our federal government but some from other approaches.

    In spite of several conversations regarding the futility of petitions in this, our modern age, including a reminder that there is nothing in Canadian law that requires the government to hear, address, or act on a given petition, he would not give up. In fact, we were informed that ‘at least he was doing something’ (thus leaving the unspoken remonstration for us to figure out, which we chose to leave shadowed).

    Now, we are just as unhappy with the government as any thinking person must be. We have chosen to act on this aversion in other ways. We homeschool, we live in the boonies, we have a frugal lifestyle, we don’t consume porn, we own guns, we love God…. and we know our history and law. We don’t sign petitions, go to protests, put FTP stickers on public buildings, or anything else that might attract certain types of attention.

    It’s too late for that. There is no stopping the enormous societal momentum that has been building since at least the Second World War, and quite frankly I am not sure we would if we could (which is a horrible thing to consider). Now is the time to get right with God, settle your affairs, and pile deeply the preps (if you haven’t already done these things, you are also a bit late, quite frankly).

    Having gone on and on, my point is this:  These people seem to feed on the ‘at least I am doing something’ mental state, irrespective of whether that something is effective, useful, or even smart. It seems to be sort of like the people who get addicted to body art… which is a thing, apparently. The required degree and depth of perceived powerlessness that would compel someone to act in ineffective ways, if only to assuage those feelings of helplessness, is indeed a wonder to behold.

    And very sad to contemplate.

    • well? on May 3, 2024 at 10:06 PM

    Chip speaks…. the swamp has mirrors that confound rational thinking….

    • Daniel K Day on May 4, 2024 at 1:52 AM

    On #3 foreign immigration into Japan, reporter Masako Ganaha says the government is in effect looking the other way while foreigners abuse the asylum request system.
    https://rumble.com/v4qhv5f-coffee-and-a-mike-with-masako-ganaha-japans-huge-migrant-problemoverstay.html
    The estimated number of foreign residents exceeded 3.4 million by last December, according to the Immigration Services Agency.
    https://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20240322/k10014399281000.html

  1. #2. Are there any untouchables remaining in public service? Our aim not to penalize small fry Pomerantz but first, the bigger fish and, second, to put a stop to this stone-walling tactic.  Thus grant him immunity from his testimony or imprison him for contempt should he still clam up. Of course a lot is riding on a positive answer to my first question. Even in NY I believe a private citizen can convene a grand jury and obtain the needed immunity with attorney assistance.

Comments have been disabled.